In Adolescent Fashion, President Calls for More Fossil-Fuel-Friendly Council

Don’t like what the climate change scientists are saying? Find different scientists.

That’s the thinking of President Donald J. Trump on global warming.

No shock. That seems to be his modus operandi on, well, everything –

  • Change the label.

Unfortunately, in all cases but particularly in this one, that’s seriously dangerous thinking.

He’s Not Gonna Take It Anymore!

Trump denied the conclusions of scientists from around the world back in October 2018 when the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its “Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 ºC.”

“Asked about the report… Donald Trump said, ‘I want to look at who drew it—you know, which group drew it,’ reported the New Yorker’s Elizabeth Kolbert.

Wha-? Obviously he didn’t understand the question.

Kolbert went on to pen one of the best lines of this whole debacle:

“… if a smoke alarm rings in the kitchen and everyone’s watching “Fox & Friends” in the den, does it make a sound?”

Then, in November 2018, Trump got mad because the U.S. Global Change Research Program, part of his own administration, released the “Fourth National Climate Assessment,” more formally known as “USGCRP, 2018: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II.”

The report outlines the billions of dollars global warming is costing, and will cost, Americans. It also contains dire warnings based on region-specific information for people who will need to change how and where they live and conduct business.

When asked about it, Trump said infamously, “I don’t believe it.”

Graphic of climate change scientist's tweet
Tweet by Climate Change Scientist Andrew Dessler, Texas A&M, 3/6/19

Doesn’t believe his own administration’s scientists, eh? Wow. He knows better, eh?

Oh yeah, that whole “stable genius” thing.

And in Trump world, if he doesn’t believe it, then it simply is not.

That, even though the “Fourth National Climate Assessment” was researched and written by the USA’S OWN SCIENTISTS from 13 federal agencies, like the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

(That is to say the individuals did work in those agencies. Given Trump’s whims and predilection for capricious firings, their continuing employment with the federal government is far from a given.)

Contributions also came from nongovernment sources, including corporations, independent research entities and universities across the country.

But, hey, why would we believe anything THEY have to say? Huh? Huh?


Fake News!

Lock them up! Lock them up! Lock them up!

Quasi-Climate-Change Scientists

Which brings us to the proposal for a new panel of Trump’s hand-picked quasi-scientists. If it comes about, they will attempt to refute the conclusions of the “Fourth National Climate Assessment.”

Thankfully, there’s “mounting pressure” from reputable scientists, present and former national security experts and U.S. military personnel on the president and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to back off.

The Center for Climate & Science organized them and sent a letter to Trump on Tuesday, according to the Washington Examiner.

The letter said, “Imposing a political test on reports issued by the science agencies, and forcing a blind spot onto the national security assessments that depend on them, will erode our national security…. Let’s drop the politics, and allow our national security and science agencies to do their jobs.”

The military and national security experts comprehend something Trump, his lackeys and his corporate string pullers either don’t get or don’t care about:

Lives are at stake.

These are serious people, and they understand climate change presents significant challenges that cannot be overlooked or brushed under the political rug.

The information they and others like them rely on has to be, well, reliable. They’re only interested in the most accurate, science- and observation-based and up-to-date information possible. They do not want planners basing decisions for the present and future safety of this nation on faulty or quasi-science.

By All Means, Question Science

To be clear, one can question science, as scientists do continuously.

They observe things. They gather, compile and analyze data. They test theories. They eliminate flawed tests, analyses and conclusions. Then they observe some more. They gather, compile and analyze more data…. Over and over again until they’re quite certain of the results and the conclusions to which the results point.

It’s called the scientific method. It’s proven. It works.

We all can, and should, question scientific findings and conclusions. Then we should accept the proof and get on with it.

For Real

Never mind that, says Trump.

“There’s no problem!” shouts the stable genius. “We’ve got scientists who say carbon dioxide is awesome for the planet and humankind. Best planet anyone has ever seen in Earth’s history! Bigly!”

Nah, man. Here’s what’s “bigly,” for real –

Global warming threatens every person on this planet, including the deniers who are organizing to “counter climate change consensus.”

Thinking like theirs could harm the United States, not to mention other nations and the health of the entire planet, in devastating ways for generations to come.

Rather than working to discredit the “Fourth National Climate Assessment,” we should be using it to act now and plan for the future. All of us should, but in particular the president and members of Congress.

It’s what real leaders do.

Personal logo of Martin C. Fredricks IV

© Martin C. Fredricks IV, 2019

Featured Photo: Tweet by Climate Change Scientist Andrew Dessler, Texas A&M, 3/6/19

If you liked this post, please follow IV Words!

Martin C. Fredricks IV

Martin C. “Red” Fredricks IV here. I’m husband to an amazing woman who is also my best friend, dad to three outstanding kids, Fargoan (North Dakota, that is), proud introvert, veteran messaging strategist/copywriter, blogger ( nonprofit founder ( and big-time reader. As they say, if you're gonna write good stuff, you have to read good stuff. A ginger, too - ergo the "Red" - although some of it's going white. Cinnamon-Sugar, I call it. Tattooed to boot; seven so far. At age 54, I'm stilling crankin' AC/DC & Metallica, but now and again I spin some Eric Church and Black Uhuru, too. I love hanging out with my (much) better half, spending time with our kids, writing, hiking, riding my mountain bike and reading.

1 Comment

David Danbom · March 26, 2019 at 12:50 pm

Excellent job, Martin, as always.

Let me know what you think!

%d bloggers like this: